Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00664
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Cecil County Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Defendant:
Cecil County Detention Center, Elkton Police Department, Cecil County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nivens v. Henslee et al
as 1:2020cv02898
Defendant:
Jessica R. Bancroft, The Public Defenders Office and Marshall T. Henslee
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Coleman v. Public Defender's Office of Montgomery County
as 1:2018cv03788
Plaintiff:
Cedric Coleman
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office of Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Grimes v. Springfield Hospital Center
as 8:2017cv01682
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Springfield Hospital Center, Public Defenders Office and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2014cv02981
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
State of Maryland, State's Attorney Offices, Public Defenders Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01973
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cofield v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv02950
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Maryland, Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
