Cases 1 - 6 of 6
California Department of Toxic, et al v. Century Indemnity Company, et al
as 20-15029
Defendant:
DAVID VAN OVER, individually, PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING, a dissolved California corporation, WEST COAST WOOD PRESERVING, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACCOUNT and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
Pacific Wood Preserving of Oregon Inc. v. Dibuduo & Defendis Insurance Brokers, LLC
as 3:2018cv00399
Defendant:
Dibuduo & Defendis Insurance Brokers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wood Preserving of Oregon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pacific Wood Preserving of Oregon, Inc. v. Sussex Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wood Preserving of Oregon, Inc.
Defendant:
Sussex Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Jim Dobbas, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00595
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Jim Dobbas, Inc., Continental Rail, Inc., David Van Over and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Jim Dobbas, Inc. et al
as 2:2014at00267
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Jim Dobbas, Inc., Continental Rail, Inc., David Van Over and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Arizona Pacific Wood Preserving, Inc. v. Mississippi Mat and Tie, LLC
as 2:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Arizona Pacific Wood Preserving, Inc.
Defendant:
Mississippi Mat and Tie, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
