Cases 51 - 60 of 373
Paez v. Akima Support Operations LLC
as 2:2021cv01920
Plaintiff:
Enrique Paez
Defendant:
Akima Support Operations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evier Paez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-16621
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVIER DIAZ PAEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Fernandez v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04610
Plaintiff:
Taty Paez Fernandez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2021cv06372
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse and Benjamin Woodhouse
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28243
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAEZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Petrozzi v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35403
Defendant / Appellee:
PAEZ, Honorable, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, STANLEY J. RUMBAUGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY R. PETROZZI
Paez v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Janina Paez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAEZ NOGUERA v. MB DORAL, LLC
as 1:2021cv21383
Defendant:
MB DORAL, LLC doing business as MARTINI BAR
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ANDRES PAEZ NOGUERA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
