Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Martinez-Palacios v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Ernesto Martinez-Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Warden Garza and Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05667
Plaintiff:
Ruben Palacios Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palacios v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv04442
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J Palacios
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palacio v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00843
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Les Palacio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Palacios et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01799
Plaintiff:
Carmen Palacios and Adrian Palacios
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montes v. Chiquita Brands International Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00157
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International Inc
Plaintiff:
Montes, Angela Maria Henao Montes, Aura Maria Ocampo Ocampo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sanchez-Palacios v. USA
as 2:2016cv00647
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alma Sanchez-Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Palacio v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tammy M Palacio
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Palacios v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00556
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Palacios
Defendant:
United States of America, Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
