Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Campbell et al v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tanya Campbell, Lindsey Berry, Brygyd Campbell and others
Defendant:
Carl "Andy" Rhodes, Sherry Lynn Harvey, Pam Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Marquise Miller
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Katie Snider, Pam Leferney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Mills et al
as 5:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Edwin White, II
Defendant:
Billy Mills and PAM Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ciempa v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2018cv00955
Defendant:
Ken Bartlett, Pam Finch, Del City City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Ciempa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Algieri v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2018cv00952
Defendant:
Garfield County Sheriffs Office, Pam LNU, Garfield County Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Joseph Algieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wakefield et al v. PAM Transport Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wakefield and Nancy Hagler
Defendant:
PAM Transport Inc, Harold Lewis Fullen, Cherokee Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Praytor v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Pam Praytor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harbison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
Pam Harbison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cordes v. Otis Elevator Company
as 5:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Pam Cordes
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Higginbottom v. Mid-Del School District et al
as 5:2015cv01091
Plaintiff:
Curtis I Higginbottom
Defendant:
Mid-Del School District , Pam Deering , Odis Clayton Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
