Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Winston v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
Paris Winston
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
Paris O. Simpson
Defendant:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01814
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Paris
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hardnett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04019
Plaintiff:
Paris Jenay Hardnett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Savidis v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02127
Plaintiff:
PARIS SAVIDIS
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oakley, Inc. v. Swami Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
Swami Management, LLC, Ghanshy Amkumar Patel and Pari Oil, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Paris-Maisonet v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02005
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Victor Paris-Maisonet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. - Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2021cv00109
Petitioner:
Paris O. Simpson
Respondent:
Lyneal Wainwright and Warden Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
