Cases 21 - 30 of 37
PARISH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv07547
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PARISH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD et al v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv05019
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HOWARD, CHIMAR RODGERS, NELSON LEON and others
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, CHRISTI RESSLER, KEVIN NEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCBRIDE v. BROWN et al
as 2:2010cv03530
Plaintiff:
ROND ROBERTS MCBRIDE
Defendant:
BROWN, JOAN SNEBERGER, FRANK GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARISH et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63731
Plaintiff:
ETHELENE PARISH and NA PARISH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARISHER v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93354
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE PARISHER and MYRTLE A. PARISHER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , ALBANY INTERNATIONAL , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARISH v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86640
Plaintiff:
ETHELENE PARISH
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARISH et al v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv86677
Plaintiff:
WENDELL L. PARISH and ROY L. PARISH
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP., PFIZER INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NATIVITY B.V.M. PARISH v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv03191
Plaintiff:
NATIVITY B.V.M. PARISH
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PARISH, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76565
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PARISH
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRAVO v. SAINT ANTHONY IN THE HILLS et al
as 2:2008cv01514
Plaintiff:
GILDARDO BRAVO
Defendant:
SAINT ANTHONY IN THE HILLS and SAINT ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
