Cases 61 - 70 of 154
Brown v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthel LaVan Brown
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hamilton
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dillard Cody Miller
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gurney Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Wells
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
James Stewart
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison et al v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas Allison
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison et al v. Parole Board Director et al
as 2:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas Allison
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Sheriff Dept. Taylor County et al
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randle
Defendant:
Sheriff Dept. Taylor County, Medical Staff, Abilene Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Smith v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARBARA S. SAMPSON, Chairperson, TED HAMMON, Parole Board Member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
