Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Missud v. Shapero et al
as 3:2016mc80140
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
Kenneth Shapero, William Elfving, Deborah Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missud v. State Bar of California
as 3:2016mc80020
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
State Bar of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missud v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 3:2015cv05596
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Auto-Return and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Patrick Missud v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv04693
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco City Attorney's Office , City Attorney Dennis Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Missud v. County of Santa Clara
as 3:2015mc80247
Petitioner:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missud v. Elfving et al
as 3:2015mc80227
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
William Elfving, Benjamin Breit, Mario Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patrick Missud, I v. Wayne Lapierre, et al
as 14-16509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE LAPIERRE and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
Patrick Missud, I v. State of California, et al
as 14-16494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Missud v. State of California et al
as 3:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
State of California, City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missud v. Lapierre et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
Wayne Lapierre and National Rifle Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
