Cases 1 - 10 of 11
TILLIO v. H & R BLOCK et al
as 2:2013cv02517
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
H & R BLOCK and TAX MASTER'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TILLIO v. LOWER MERION POLICE et al
as 2:2012cv02419
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, JR
Defendant:
LOWER MERION POLICE and LOWER MERION POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. NELL et al
as 2:2012cv02420
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
ROCIO NELL, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. H&R BLOCK et al
as 2:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
H&R BLOCK and TAX MASTER'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TILLIO v. RODRIGUZ et al
as 2:2012cv01170
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
JOE RODRIGUZ and VINCENT'S HARWOOD FLOORING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO et al v. RICCHINIE et al
as 2:2011cv06148
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
JOE RICCHINIE, STEPHEN SCHWARTZ, LOU MOLINERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO et al v. NORTHLAND GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05516
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR., EMANUELA COKER and JIM OSMAN
Defendant:
NORTHLAND GROUP INC., SHERAWN M. HOLLIE, HARRY SPIESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO et al v. RANRAZY et al
as 2:2011cv05320
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
JOE RANRAZY, HARRY SPIESS, JIM W. TILLIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv05302
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, JR
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LOWER MERION POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. HR BLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv04452
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
HR BLOCK, IRS OFFICE, 1040 TAEXES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
