Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ginn v. PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC
as 4:2023cv02830
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ginn
Defendant:
PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Koval v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
as 2:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mark S Koval
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Adams et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
as 4:2015cv03291
Plaintiff:
Randy Adams and Mitchell Van Nest
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Heikkila et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
as 4:2015cv01443
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Heikkila and Kevin Brengelmann
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Phillips Jr. v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Donald Phillips Jr.
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Phillips, Jr. et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
as 2:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Donald Phillips, Jr., Paul Dillion Luna, Jr. and Jeff Walls
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phillips, Jr. et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
as 2:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Donald Phillips, Jr. , Paul Dillion Luna, Jr. and Jeff Walls
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mercer et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
as 4:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Mercer and James Hanks
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Landry v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
as 6:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Luther Landry
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Machecek v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
as 6:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuck Machecek
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
