Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fisher, Jr. v. Forde et al
as 2:2019cv12203
Defendant:
Maura Corrigan, Michele Forde, Paul Klee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2017cv12261
Plaintiff:
Hopkins T. Charles
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Dept of Corrections, Paul Klee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv11235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv11234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv13765
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 , John Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Borgerding, M.D. et al
as 4:2016cv13505
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu #189355
Defendant:
William Borgerding, M.D. , Cathy Lewis, Sabrina Aikens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu #189355 v. Lewis et al
as 2:2016cv13482
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu #189355
Defendant:
Cathy Lewis, Sabrina Aikens, Brian Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 1, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK SNYDER, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14356
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTH v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRETIONS et al
as 2:2012cv15251
Plaintiff:
MARIUM MERRITT RUTH
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRETIONS, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Paul Klee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
