Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Paul Goodwin v. Troy Steele
as 14-3764
Petitioner - Appellant:
Paul T. Goodwin
Respondent - Appellee:
Troy Steele
Paul Goodwin v. Troy Steele
as 14-3739
Petitioner - Appellant:
Paul T. Goodwin
Respondent - Appellee:
Troy Steele
Richard Strong, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-2354
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Movant - Appellant:
Richard Strong and Marcellus S. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
David Zink, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield, Leon Taylor and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
William Rousan v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1919
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William L. Rousan
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Jeffrey Ferguson v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1693
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey R. Ferguson
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Paul Goodwin v. Donald Roper
as 14-1588
Petitioner - Appellant:
Paul T. Goodwin
Respondent - Appellee:
Donald P. Roper
Michael Anthony Taylor v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1388
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Herbert Smulls v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1193
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Herbert Smulls
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
