Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Servpro Industries, Inc., et al v. Tammy Woloski, et al
as 21-5685
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. and SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., nka Servpro Industries, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
TAMMY WOLOSKI, PAUL WOLOSKI and DELTA DAWGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, dba Servpro of Rosemead / South El Monte
Appellee:
RICHARD CONNER
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00785
Defendant:
Servpro Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Ricky Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. Servpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03095
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Defendant:
SEREVPRO Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Servpro Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02907
Defendant:
SERVPRO Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Ricky Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02906
Defendant:
SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. and Richard Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Servpro Industries, Inc. v. Woloski et al
as 3:2017cv01433
Defendant:
Tammy Woloski, Delta Dawgs Construction Corp., Paul Woloski and others
Plaintiff:
Servpro Industries, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Richard Connor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
