Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pease v. State Farm Lloyd's
as 3:2019cv00296
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyd's
Plaintiff:
Ismael Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Zadeh v. Pease et al
as 4:2017cv00219
Defendant:
Sharon Pease, Belinda West, Mari Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zadeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pease v. Shipra Enterprise Inc.
as 4:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shani Pease
Defendant:
Shipra Enterprise Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01234
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Rutherford v. Dynamic Downhole Services, LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv00452
Defendant:
Dynamic Downhole Services, LLC and John K. Pease, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Dean Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Zadeh et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2015cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Dr. Joseph A. Zadeh
Defendant:
Kara Kirby, Sharon Pease and Mari Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pease et al v. Fletcher
as 1:2015cv00297
Defendant:
Christopher J. Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Dessie W. Pease
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vasquez v. Pease
as 5:2014cv00609
Defendant:
Terri Pease
Plaintiff:
Leticia Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Pease v. Colvin et al
as 1:2014cv00030
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and John Koskinen
Plaintiff:
Dessie W. Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 407 Federal Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance
Pease v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2012cv01009
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Plaintiff:
Crae R. Pease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
