Cases 51 - 60 of 879
Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund et al v. Sota et al
as 5:2022cv02974
Plaintiff:
Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund
Defendant:
Aaron Sota and Laurel Bivins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
In re Netflix, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
Fiyyaz Pirani and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Ted Sarandos and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Petitioner:
Ty Correy
Trustees of the Elevator Industry Work Preservation Fund et al v. Consolidated Elevator Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00092
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Elevator Industry Work Preservation Fund, Trustees of the Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan, Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Elevator Co., Inc., Thomas G. Wallis, II, Thomas C. Wallis and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Superior Air, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01792
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Pensioners and Surviving Spouses Health Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Superior Air, Inc. and Vinod Jothilingam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Trust v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Trust
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, David Wehner and others
Petitioner:
Frederic Lou, Charles Tebele, Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. and others
U.A. Local 393 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. THE KRAUTSTRUNK COMPANY, INC.
as 5:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 393 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, U.A. LOCAL 393 PENSION FUND, Alex Hall and others
Defendant:
THE KRAUTSTRUNK COMPANY, INC. doing business as HAUSER CONSTRUCTION and THE KRAUTSTRUNK COMPANY, INC. a California corporation doing business as HAUSER CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Record Automatic Doors, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Robert Williams, John Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Record Automatic Doors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund et al v. Premier Sign Services, Inc et al
as 5:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund, Southern California Local 831 Employer Pension Fund and California Tradeshow and Sign Crafts Joint Training Trust Fund of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 36
Defendant:
Premier Sign Services Inc, Does 1-10 and Premier Sign Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Pension Fund, et al. v. Atkins Specialty Services, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv01656
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman and Apprenticeship Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Atkins Specialty Services, Inc., Atkins Services, Inc., Jeffrey Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
