Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Teamsters Local Union No. 957 v. Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P.
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local Union No. 957
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Home-Owners Insurance Company et al v. Sims et al
as 3:2020cv01850
Defendant:
Taurean J. Sims, Midwest Construction Services, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co.,L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
P&P Transportation Services, Inc. and Home-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutphen et al v. Poch Staffing, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Taurean J. Sims, P&P Transportation Services, Inc., Elmer J. Kropf and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sutphen and Terry Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diloreto v. Area Storage & Transfer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01371
Plaintiff:
Rita Diloreto
Defendant:
Area Storage & Transfer, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crumby et al v. Fraser et al
as 3:2007cv00428
Plaintiff:
James Crumby, James Crumby, James Crumby and others
Defendant:
James Harold Fraser, UTL Transportation Services East and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Counter-Claimant:
UTL Transportation Services East
Counter-Defendant:
James Crumby and James Crumby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Franklin v. Ballard et al
as 3:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Franklin and Michael R. Franklin
Defendant:
Carnell C. Ballard, Exel, Inc., Lynn W. Mango and others
Cross-Claimant:
Exel, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Carnell C. Ballard and others
Cross Defendant:
Lynn W. Mango, Lynn W. Mango, CBS Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
