Cases 41 - 50 of 133
Perez v. Valley Hotel et al
as 4:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Valley Hotel and Thomas E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. TKB ELECTRIC, LLC
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
TKB ELECTRIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. FGMA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
FGMA, INC., FELIX GUTIERREZ and MAURILLO ALVA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. AUTHORIZED FACTORY SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2016cv01836
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PEREZ
Defendant:
AUTHORIZED FACTORY SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. CITI MATTRESS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv08987
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
CITI MATTRESS INC., CITI MATTRESS LLC, CLAUDIA RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
PEREZ v. SMITH et al
as 3:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW KENNETH SMITH , WIND TURBINE SOLUTIONS, LLC and WIND TURBINE SOLUTIONS, LLC RETIREMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
PEREZ v. HESS COMMERCIAL PRINTING, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01796
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
HESS COMMERCIAL PRINTING, INC. and JASON M. HESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
as 2:2016cv06197
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TEAMSTER LOCAL 97 BENEFITS FUND et al v. WHITE HOUSE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2016cv06449
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 BENEFITS FUND , JOHN J. GEROW , MARIA PEREZ and others
Defendant:
WHITE HOUSE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
PEREZ v. STEVEN KEARES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05072
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN KEARES, INC., HARRY S. KEARES and STEVEN KEARS, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
