Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
OUAZIZ v. CITY OF JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04546
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY, TAWANA MODDY, CHIEF OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2022cv04173
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO VICENTE PEREZ and CATHLEEN HANENBERG PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DOE v. MCELROY et al
as 2:2021cv17956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LARRICK MCELROY, DEVOUGHN MOORE, GUSTAVO FRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KALIEF v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv05729
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CCPD/DEA TASK FORCE, USMS CUSTODIAN OF SADF and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY KALIEF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v. VALVANO et al
as 2:2021cv03150
Defendant:
MARCUS HICKS, SEAN ST.PAUL, SARAH DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIEAUNA GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
