Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Kinlocke v. Perez et al
as 1:2015cv03847
Plaintiff: Keisha M. Kinlocke
Defendant: Thomas E. Perez, Douglas Fitzgerald, Tisha Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00063
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03161
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bostic et al v. County of Douglas et al
as 1:2011cv03585
Plaintiff: Santerria Bostic , Scott Bostic , Willcinja Rushing and others
Defendant: County of Douglas , Douglas County Sheriff's Office , Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz et al v. Clayton County Georgia et al
as 1:2010cv02840
Plaintiff: Porfirio Correa Diaz and Glafira Perez-Diaz
Defendant: Clayton County Georgia, Police Department of Clayton County, Jeffrey E. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02578
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00120
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00575
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?