Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Sato et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Francis Shichiro Sato and Sonia Jean Sato
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Perez v. Kazu Construction LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Kazu Construction LLC and Vernon Lowry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Rincon-Ibarra
as 1:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Tomasa Rincon-Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Fat Law's Farm, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Fat Law's Farm, Inc. , Frank Law , Alice Law and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Javier v. National Bank Association et al
as 1:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Severino Javier
Defendant:
National Bank Association, Marvin L. Pettis, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Perez v. Cook et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Norberto Pangelinan Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Cook , Leonard Smith and Don Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Reef Development of Hawaii, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00653
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Reef Development of Hawaii, Inc., Samuel Sanchez Aguirre and Reef Development of Hawaii, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. C & C Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
C & C Security, Inc., Richard A. Groder, Jr. and Kelii C. Correa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Casados v. Drury et al
as 1:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Yoko Casados
Defendant:
Lori A. Drury, Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., Diane Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
