Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Mark D. Waldron, et al v. Perkins Coie LLP, et al
as 22-35104
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GIGA WATT, INC., a Washington corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK D. WALDRON, Chapter 7 Trustee
Defendant / Appellant:
PERKINS COIE LLP, a Washington limited liability partnership and LOWELL NESS, individual and California resident
Defendant:
GIGA WATT PTE., LTD., a Singapore corporation and ANDREY KUZENNY, a citizen of the Russian Federation
Anthony Patel v. Patricia Miller, et al
as 20-55243
Defendant:
SIDLEY & AUSTIN, EISNER JAFFE, LYNNE MCCULLOUGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEYER OLSON LOWY AND MEYERS, NEMECEK AND COLE, AKSHAI RUNCHAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. PATEL
Anthony Patel v. Charles Robinson, et al
as 20-55241
Defendant / Appellee:
MARANGA MORGENSTERN, REED SMITH LLP, MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, PLC and others
Defendant:
LEAH WILSON and THE MALONEY FIRM APC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. PATEL
Anthony Patel v. Patricia Miller, et al
as 19-56285
Defendant:
SIDLEY & AUSTIN, EISNER JAFFE, LYNNE MCCULLOUGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEYER OLSON LOWY AND MEYERS, NEMECEK AND COLE, AKSHAI RUNCHAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. PATEL
Denise Subramaniam v. Gabrielle Richards, et al
as 17-35982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE SUBRAMANIAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GABRIELLE D. RICHARDS, ERCIK J. HAYNIE, PERKINS COIE LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nicholas Rockefeller v. Perkins Coie LLP, et al
as 10-56530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS ROCKEFELLER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
PERKINS COIE LLP, a Washington Professional Service Corporation, BIDERMAN SHERMAN, a California a business entity, form unknown, ATTORNEYS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., a Vermont Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
