Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Aviles v. Bludworth, et al.
as 24-2167
Petitioner:
WAYNE AVILES
Respondent:
PETE BLUDWORTH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Chesterman v. Bludworth et al.
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersen v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Petersen
Defendant:
Brian M. Gootkin, Cynthia Wolken, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witkowski v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Jay Donald Witkowski
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Montana
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spotted Elk v. Core Civic et al
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Abraham Spotted Elk
Defendant:
Core Civic, John and Jane Doe, Shareholders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spotted Elk v. Core Civic et al
as 9:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Abraham Spotted Elk
Defendant:
Core Civic, John and Jane Doe, Shareholders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ariegwe v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arvidson v. Business Manager Waln et al
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arvidson
Defendant:
Business Manager Waln, Unit Manager Cannon, Pete Bludworth and others
In Re:
Crossroads Correctional Center Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
