Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kanam v. Department of Natural Resources, et al
as 3:2016cv05702
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kanam
Defendant:
Department of Natural Resources , Office of Peter Goldmark and Office of Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Brady et al
as 3:2014cv05662
Plaintiff:
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Michael D Brady , Ray Mabus , Department of the Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Brady et al
as 3:2014cv05620
Plaintiff:
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Michael D Brady , Ray Mabus , Department of the Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Peter Goldmark, et al
as 14-35209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER GOLDMARK, Washington State Commissioner of Public Lands, Administrator for the Department of Natural Resources, and member of the Board of Natural Resources, LENNY YOUNG, Supervisor for the Department of Natural Resources, BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General for the State of Washington and others
McLaren v. Ferris, et al
as 2:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLaren
Defendant:
Melissa Ferris, Peter Goldmark, Nancy Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Goldmark et al
as 3:2013cv05071
Plaintiff:
Skokomish Indian Tribe
Defendant:
Peter Goldmark , Lenny Young , Thomas DeLuca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Trask v. McKenna et al
as 3:2010cv05882
Plaintiff:
Russell Trask
Defendant:
Robert M. McKenna, Peter Goldmark, Department of Community Development Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Snyder v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2010cv05286
Plaintiff:
Brian N. Snyder
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Peter Goldmark and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
