Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Riggins v. Woodruff et al
as 1:2022cv04590
Petitioner:
Daryl (Dewayne) Riggins
Respondent:
Sheriff, Mr. James Woodruff, Dr. Peter (John) Skandalakis, A. Quillian Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beattie v. The Warden et al
as 6:2021cv01370
Plaintiff:
Peter John Beattie
Defendant:
The Warden, Chief Executive Officer and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beattie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01184
Petitioner:
Peter John Beattie
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Carroll County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff's Dept., Haralson County Sheriff's Dept., Donald Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Dimitrion v. Florida Department of Corr.
as 17-13460
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER JOHN DIMITRION
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dimitrion v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv14179
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Peter John Dimitrion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. TODD et al
as 5:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK
Defendant:
JACK ALLEN TODD, ZELL MILLER, ANGIE EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Reeves et al
as 3:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Shannon Terrell Cameron
Defendant:
Marty Reeves, FNU Bolt, FNU Hensey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Reeves et al
as 3:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Shannon Terrell Cameron
Defendant:
Marty Reeves, FNU Bolt, FNU Hensey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussey v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Defendant:
Shirlene Lowery Brown, Peter John Skandalakis and Robert Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
