Cases
Jimmy Riley v. Peter Oppeneer
as 22-1115
Petitioner: JIMMY RILEY
Respondent: PETER OPPENEER, Magistrate Judge
Interested Party: BRIAN LANG, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, ADAM THIELEN and others
Morris, Michael v. Dept. of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01033
Defendant: Cathy Jess, Emily Davidson, Mr. Broadbent and others
Plaintiff: Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris, Michael v. Dickman, Tammy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00986
Defendant: Gary Boughton, Tammy Dickman, Dept. of Corrections and others
Undetermined: WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff: Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Mitchell, Jr. v. Peter A. Oppeneer
as 17-2721
Petitioner: ROY A. MITCHELL, JR.
Respondent: PETER OPPENEER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00745
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tatum, Robert v. Cimpl, Dennis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00690
Plaintiff: Robert L. Tatum
Defendant: Dennis Cimpl, Christine Charette, Kelly Defort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin, Roger v. Oppeneer, Peter et al
as 3:2013cv00480
Plaintiff: Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant: Peter Oppeneer, William M. Conley, Rudolph T. Randa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lim v. Walker et al
as 1:2012cv06925
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lim, Khor v. Walker, Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00625
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?