Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 3:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
Susan Diane Wojcicki, William Henry Cates, Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota
as 4:2020cv04180
Plaintiff:
Brian Peters
Defendant:
Bowling Green Inn of South Dakota, Inc. doing business as Keystone Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zourkas v. Peters et al
as 5:2020cv05069
Defendant:
Jason Aaron Peters and Krull Foods of HC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Zourkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emery et al v. PJH Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv05035
Plaintiff:
Wilson D. Emery and Darius E. Emery
Defendant:
PJH Companies, Inc., James G. Rickert and Peter Hagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balestracci v. Jaton et al
as 4:2016cv04013
Plaintiff:
Peter Balestracci
Defendant:
Jodie Jaton and Jared McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meidinger v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2012cv05064
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Meidinger
Defendant:
City of Rapid City , Peter Ragnone , Steve Allender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvillo et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv04033
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Calvillo , Nathan Calvillo , Joleen F. Delutri and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. , Siouxland Urology Center, L.L.C. , John A. Wolpert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinney et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2009cv04051
Plaintiff:
Theresa Kinney, Theresa Kinney, Theresa Kinney and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C., John A. Wolpert, David D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Finegan v. O'Brien, et al.
as 4:2008cv04029
Plaintiff:
Teresa A. Finegan and Teresa A. Finegan
Defendant:
Peter J. O'Brien, MD and Sioux Valley Clinic, Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
