Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Tim Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC, et al
as 23-3773
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC and Sidearm Sports, LLC
United States v. Nicole Peterson
as 23-2538
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nicole Peterson
HCI Distribution, Inc., et al v. Douglas Peterson, et al
as 23-2311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HCI Distribution, Inc. and Rock River Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas Joseph Peterson, Nebraska Attorney General and Tony Fulton, Nebraska Tax Commissioner
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Glen A. White, Interim Nebraska Tax Commissioner
Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC. et al
as 8:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC, Sidearm Sports, LLC, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
United States v. Jesse Peterson
as 22-2197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesse William Peterson
Giles v. EEOC of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. Giles
Defendant:
EEOC of Minneapolis, Karen Seymour, Ms. Lauren Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Dayne Sitladeen
as 22-1010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dayne Adrian Sitladeen, also known as Dante Peterson
Damion Burns v. Jerald Peterson
as 21-3485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damion Burns
Defendant / Appellee:
Jerald Peterson, JCCC COI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
