Cases 11 - 20 of 1,812
USA v. Peterson
as 24-10098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI, TERRI PETERSON, TRUDI DAUB and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Hill v. Sinclair, et al.
as 24-506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in his individual capacity, TYLER TOMPKINS, Counselor for WADOC, BILLIE PETERSON, Policy Program Manager WADOC and others
USA v. Enobahkare Peterson
as 24-10332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ENOBAHKARE MALIK PETERSON
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Peterson v. Best, et al.
as 24-354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH V. PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN BEST, an individual doing business as Best Law PLLC and BEST LAW OFFICE, PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
USA v. Peterson
as 24-30043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
George Peterson
Hamilton v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation, Marc Baumann, Alice Peterson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
