Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ames v. Radzimski et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Judge Lech J Radzimski, Wesley Bruce Ames, Stanley Roy Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Spokane Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Ferguson
Defendant:
Spokane superior Court, Callalily Q Ferguson, Jared B Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna v. United States Coast Guard
as 2:2020cv01451
Plaintiff:
Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna
Defendant:
United States Coast Guard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP et al v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2020cv05909
Plaintiff:
Gavin Myers, Alpha Venture Capital Partners LP, Law Offices of Kenneth E. Chyten 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn, Inc. and CytoDyn Inc
Defendant:
Nader Z. Pourhassan and Nader Z Pourhassan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ferrie v. Woodford Research LLC et al
as 3:2019cv05798
Defendant:
David Peterson, Woodford Research, LLC, Horizon Trust Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ferrie
Defendant / Appellant:
DPT Innovations, LLC, Jared Carter and Karen Arvin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Patterson v. Peterson Enterprises Inc
as 2:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Latalia Patterson
Defendant:
Peterson Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eaton et al v. Peterson Enterprises Inc
as 2:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jared Eaton and Ariel Eaton
Defendant:
Peterson Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
