Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00215
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Phan v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv03073
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Defendant: State Farm Insurance Company, Kaiser Permanente, Peter Weingarten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pham v. Jame We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6232
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUNG T. PHAM
Defendant - Appellee: DEBORAH LEE JAMES, Secretary Department of Air Force
Ngo v. Walgreens Company et al
as 1:2014cv00520
Plaintiff: Andrew Ngo
Defendant: Walgreens Company, Jennifer Ortega, Danieray Johnsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pham v. Ahrens, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant: MINH PHAM
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL AHRENS, Officer, in his official and individual capacity and GLENN MAHR, Officer, in his official and individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3240
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pham v. Donley
as 5:2013cv00743
Plaintiff: Hung Thai Pham
Defendant: Michael B Donley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pham v. City of Denver, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02155
Plaintiff: Minh Pham
Defendant: City of Denver, Michael Ahrens, Michael (I) Ahrens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?