Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Northwest Building Components, Inc. v. Adams
as 1:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Northwest Building Components, Inc.
Defendant:
Philip D. Adams
Church v. Wasden
as 1:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
Philip Raymond Church
Respondent:
Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Human Dynamics and Diagnostics, LLC v. Hernandez
as 4:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Human Dynamics and Diagnostics, LLC and Philip Girling
Defendant:
Sarah Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoffman et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Deborah Ann Ferguson and John Doe Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Philip A Hoffman and Donna L Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craft v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00078
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sean Philip Craft
Respondent:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Turney et al v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Philip A Turney, Billy Ray Bartlett, James S Hendrickson and others
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GSL Technology, Inc. et al v. Gemini Technologies, Incorporated et al
as 1:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
GSL Technology, Inc. and Gregory S Latka
Defendant:
Gemini Technologies, Incorporated , Philip H Dater and Daniel J Whelan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pollacia et al v. Idaho High School Activities Association
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Frank Pollacia and Philip Pollacia
Defendant:
Idaho High School Activities Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hanson v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Philip Hanson
Defendant:
Canyon County and Kieran Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
