Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Phillips v. Kaufmann
as 3:2010cv01224
Defendant:
Officer Randy Kaufmann
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. McKeon et al
as 3:2010cv01208
Defendant:
Dionel M. Aviles, James T. Conway, John H. Dalton and others
Amicu:
Jane Does 1-50
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bowers et al v. Whitman et al
as 1:2009cv03082
Plaintiff:
Jon Bowers, Lynna Bowers, A.L. Bruner and others
Defendant:
Richard Whitman and State of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gonzales v. City of Nyssa et al
as 2:2008cv06203
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales, David Gonzales and David Gonzales
Defendant:
City of Nyssa, Lennie Elfering and Phillip Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
