Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Phillip Knight v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 16-30159
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP KNIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Knight v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv01420
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. 24th Judicial, Sec D et al
as 2:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
24th Judicial Sec. D
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Cane et al
as 3:2011cv00320
Defendant:
Burl Cane, Main Prison, Unknown Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. The State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
The State of Louisiana and The Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Div-A
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2008cv05103
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2008cv04033
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Louisiana State and Gretna City
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Connick et al
as 2:2008cv03727
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Paul D Connick, Jr
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Warden et al
as 2:2007cv02801
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Formen et al
as 2:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Richard Formen
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
