Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonkins v. Morgan
as 1:2021cv00351
Respondent:
J. Phillip Morgan and State of Maryland
Petitioner:
Cedric Rodriquez Tonkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Connors v. Morgan et al
as 8:2019cv01875
Defendant:
LT. Brown, Corizon Health, J. Phillip Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Connors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCoy v. Maryland Attorney General et al
as 8:2019cv00233
Respondent:
Warden Phillip Morgan and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Walter L McCoy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Morgan et al
as 8:2018cv03016
Defendant:
D.P.S.C.S., Warden M.C.I.J., Phillip Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Chance Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Ireland v. Moyer et al
as 8:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamont Ireland
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Kathleen Green, Dayena Cocoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Jones et al
as 8:2017cv01283
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Miller
Defendant:
Duval Jones, Kellen Kranich, Crystal Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koenig v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2017cv01200
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Koenig
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Stephen T. Moyer, Maryland Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Morgan et al
as 1:2017cv00634
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
J. Phillip Morgan and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nivens v. J. Phillip Morgan
as 8:2016cv02648
Petitioner:
Stephen Nivens
Respondent:
J. Phillip Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
