Cases 11 - 20 of 60
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02232
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02200
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BASTANI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
ALI BASTANI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 1:2016cv02512
Plaintiff:
RADCLIFFE BANCROFT LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, PHYLLIS D. THOMPSON, JOHN M. FERREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00208
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
YELVERTON v. MARM et al
as 1:2014mc01005
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON
Defendant:
DEBORAH MARM and PHYLLIS EDMUNDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
JOHNSON et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv01642
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01544
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
