Cases 1 - 10 of 21
McGill v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ann McGill
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01905
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Krajewski v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv00418
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Maureen Phyllis Krajewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Gilliland et al v. SFPP, L.P., et al
as 6:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fred Banks, Jill Banks, Gary Brewer and others
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2013cv01788
Defendant:
Clackamas County Courts and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Anita Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
