Cases 21 - 30 of 71
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. PRUITT
as 1:2017cv01233
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, CHESAPEAKE, INC.
Defendant:
SCOTT PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al
as 4:2017cv02824
Plaintiff:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. , Resolute FP US, Inc. , Resolute FP Augusta, LLC and others
Defendant:
Greenpeace International , Greenpeace, Inc. , Greenpeace Fund, Inc. and others
Movant:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 11 additional media organizations
Amicu:
Alaska Wilderness League , Center for Biological Diversity , Center for international Environmental Law and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CLEAN WATER ACTION et al v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
CLEAN WATER ACTION , ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
E. SCOTT PRUITT and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant:
Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2016cv01724
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL, NEIL KORNZE and U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. MCCARTHY
as 1:2016cv01643
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK , PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, CHESAPEAKE, INC. and others
Defendant:
GINA MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Oak Grove Management Company v. EPA, et al
as 16-1206
Petitioner:
Oak Grove Management Company, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA
as 16-1210
Petitioner:
Utility Air Regulatory Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Southern Company Services, Inc, et al v. EPA
as 16-1208
Petitioner:
Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
