Cases 1 - 6 of 6
S.L., et al v. Pierce Twp. Bd. of Trustees, et al
as 13-3892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
S.L., a minor, by and through his guardian and next friend K.L. and K.L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROE, Nos. 1-10, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated., et al.
Defendant:
PIERCE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS G. DELGRANDE and EDWARD S. BARTLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, aka Shawn Bartley, aka E. Shawn Bartley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
S.L., et al v. Pierce Township Board of Trust, et al
as 11-4003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
S.L., a minor, by and through his guardian and next friend, K.L., K.L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RICHARD ROE NOS. 1 TO 10, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
PIERCE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS G. DELGRANDE
S.L., et al v. Pierce Township Board of Trust, et al
as 11-4004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
S.L., a minor, by and through his guardian and next friend, K.L., K.L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RICHARD ROE NOS. 1 TO 10, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
PIERCE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID K. HOMER
Board of Trustees of Pierce Township, Ohio v. Hartman
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Pierce Township, Ohio and Board of Trustees of Pierce Township, Ohio
Defendant:
Curt C. Hartman, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
K.L. et al v. Pierce Township Board of Trustees et al
as 1:2007cv00986
Plaintiff:
K.L. and K.L.
Defendant:
Pierce Township Board of Trustees, James T Smith, David K Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
