Cases filed in District of Columbia
KIM v. EISNER et al
as 1:2017cv00803
Plaintiff: OK CHA KIM
Defendant: LORI JOY EISNER , KENDRA YOUNG AUSBY , W. MICHEL PIERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURDOCK v. BWW LAW GROUP et al
as 1:2014cv02100
Plaintiff: ROBIN MURDOCK
Defendant: BWW LAW GROUP, FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP., CYNTHIA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURDOCK v. WARD et al
as 1:2014cv01947
Plaintiff: ROBIN MURDOCK
Defendant: CARRIE M. WARD, HOWARD N. BIERMAN, HOWARD BIERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REZENDE v. BREGER et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff: MAURICIO REZENDE
Defendant: JOSHUA BREGER , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , JULIA PIERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
FRASIER et al v. CITIMORTGAGE INCORPORATED
as 1:2012mc00609
Petitioner: EUGENE FRASIER, TAWANNA FRASIER, AUDREY PIERSON and others
Respondent: CITIMORTGAGE INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff: BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant: CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01700
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PALMERTON et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2010cv00100
Plaintiff: DELROY COREY PALMERTON and IRL CAROLYN COYNE ROUSSEAU
Defendant: UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?