Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Gaspar et al v. G T Good Distribution LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01388
Plaintiff:
Cuauhtemoc Ivan Calixto Gaspar and Wilmer Donary Quijada Cardoza
Defendant:
Ru Ping Lin, Bin Liu, Chen Bin and others
Pretrial Service:
MICHAEL A. LEVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02524
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shenzhen Meiladi Electronic Co., Changsha Fengmeichang Information Technology Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Li v. Fashion Show Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02465
Defendant:
Sau Ping Lin, Cheng Wing Kwong, Fashion Show Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Qing Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Wan Lin v. William Barr
as 19-71623
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
WAN PING LIN, AKA Wen-Bin Lin
Zheng v. Great Wall In East Elmhurst Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Great Wall In East Elmhurst Inc. and Rong Ping Lin
Plaintiff:
Qin Wen Zheng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Weng v. Japanese Steak House Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 2:2018cv00183
Defendant:
Hana Japanese Steakhouse, Ming Guang Xu, Jin Mu Xu and others
Plaintiff:
Qi Qing Weng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Monda Window & Door Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06848
Defendant:
Dancy Lin, Elias Abubeker, Monda Window & Door, Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Ping Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
