Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUANG-LIU ET AL V. MAGUIRE
as 2:2016cv05175
Plaintiff:
XI-REN HUANG-LIU and PING LIU
Defendant:
BRIAN MAGUIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Qiu (Chen)
as 16-2683
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ze Xi Qiu, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Doufu Ke, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Hong Gang Yang, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Yichao Chen, AKA Wendy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv00124
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Busheng Wang, Chang Guo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Liu et al v. Studio Nails & Spa, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv09128
Plaintiff:
Al Ping Liu
Defendant:
Studio Nails & Spa, Inc., Hartsdale Floris Spa, and Nails Inc., Kyung Sil Ahn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Liu v. Holder
as 12-2428
Petitioner:
Ping Liu
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Liu v. Holder
as 12-270
Petitioner:
Bi Fu Liu and Yan Ping Liu
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
