Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Robert Idahosa v. City of Columbus, Georgia, et al
as 17-12169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT IDAHOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD BOREN, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paul v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
as 0:2017cv60697
Plaintiff:
Jerry Paul
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teamcare Infusion Orlando, Inc. v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Teamcare Infusion Orlando, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary, United States Treasury, Debt Management Services, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, CGS Administrators, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Joseph v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
as 0:2016cv60230
Plaintiff:
Latoiya Joseph
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
