Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 421
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff: HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant: SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2511
Plaintiff: HANNAH COUSIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINDA CAMUS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: SHARP HEALTHCARE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00720
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc, et al.
as 24-188
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHAWN LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee: MATTERPORT, INC, RJ PITTMAN, DAVE GAUSEBECK and others
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc, et al.
as 23-4281
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHAWN LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee: MATTERPORT, INC, RJ PITTMAN, DAVE GAUSEBECK and others
Pittman v. Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff: Kawauna Pittman
Defendant: Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP v. SC SJ Holdings LLC
as 5:2023mc80209
Plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Defendant: SC SJ Holdings LLC
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP v. FMT SJ LLC
as 5:2023mc80208
Plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Defendant: FMT SJ LLC
Pittman v. Wells Fargo N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv03699
Plaintiff: Randy D. Pittman
Defendant: Wells Fargo N.A., Visa Inc. and VISA USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?