Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02834
Plaintiff:
Jazmar Thomas
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, WAKU, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, NIBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Test Plaintiff v. Test Defendant1
as 3:2020cv09000
Plaintiff:
Test Plaintiff
Defendant:
Test Defendant1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. KOSINSKIN et al
as 2:2016cv04621
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JONES
Respondent:
GERALD KOSINSKI, JESSICA BASS, DIST ATTNY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv04832
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01556
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B.O.P., FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MILLER v. ALICE et al
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
RAZZAAQ MILLER
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALICE, EDGAR RUTH, ALL HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICERS PRESENT ON JAN 13, 2012 AT PLAINTIFFS ARREST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Rendell et al
as 1:2013cv02842
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Dominguez
Defendant:
Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLAINTIFF v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv06509
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLAINTIFF v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv06329
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: PRISON OVERCROWDING CASES
as 2:2011cv03711
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
CITY DEFENDANTS , PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and MHM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
