Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 116
HEINEMAN et al v. WYETH LLC
as 2:2015cv20001
Plaintiff: JENNIFER HEINEMAN , ERIC ALLEN HEINEMAN and SILL LAW GROUP, PLLC
Defendant: WYETH LLC
Intervenor: PLAINTIFFS' MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv04832
Plaintiff: RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant: CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NIASPAN ANTITRUST LITIGATION et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES AND ABBVIE, INC.
as 2:2015mc00141
Plaintiff: DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES AND ABBVIE, INC.
Movant: LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2002at06000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff
Defendant: Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT
as 2:2005mc02025
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF
Defendant: DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT
as 3:2005mc02025
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF
Defendant: DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT
as 1:2005mc02025
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF
Defendant: DEFENDANT
INTHATHIRATH et al v. TERMINI BROTHERS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06695
Plaintiff: JERRY B. INTHATHIRATH , CHRISTSNA L. NGEM and ANY OTHER PAST OR PRESENT EMPLOYEES WHO ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED AND HEREAFTER BECOME PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: TERMINI BROTHERS, INC. , JOSEPH TERMINI, JR. and VINCENT TERMINI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2014mc00252
Respondent: ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Movant: SRINIVAS RAO MALLAVARAPU , ALAN H. POLLACK and ANDREW J. MILLER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2014mc00250
Movant: USHA SANKARAN , ROBERT G. SHEPHERD , JOSEPH TODISCO and others
Respondent: ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?