Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 24-3526
Defendant: DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Merritt
as 24-3532
Defendant: SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT and Susan Tennenbaum
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-3536
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN and ALBIN RHOMBERG
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-212
Defendant / Appellant: SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant: DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 23-4398
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant: SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Sandra Merritt, et al
as 20-16820
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant: GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant / Appellant: SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Albin Rhomberg, et al
as 20-16773
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant: GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALBIN RHOMBERG
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16068
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant: GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant / Appellant: TROY NEWMAN
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 20-16070
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden and Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?