Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Yusef Maisonet v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSEF MAISONET
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER, PLANS AND PROGRAMS, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTIONS, PASTORAL PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Coalition of Concerned Citizen, et al v. Federal Transit, et al
as 16-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COALITION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS TO MAKE ARTSMART, 2706 CENTRAL AVENUE, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, FOX PLAZA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH AGUIRRE, ALBUQUERQUE BARBERSHOP, MARIA BAUTISTA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the United States, ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, in his official capacity, ROBERT C. PATRICK, Regional Director for Region VI of the Federal Transit Administration, in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCIL, ISAAC BENTON, PAT DAVIS and others
Brian Loomis, et al v. Exelon Corporation, et al
as 10-1755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LOOMIS, DEBRA COGSWELL, RON WELTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EXELON CORPORATION, WILLIAM BERGMAN, in his capacity as Exelon Corporation's Director of Employee Benefit Plans and Programs, COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF EXELON CORPORATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Brian Loomis, et al v. Exelon Corporation, et al
as 09-4081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LOOMIS, DEBRA COGSWELL, RON WELTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EXELON CORPORATION, WILLIAM BERGMAN, in his capacity as Exelon Corporation's Director of Employee Benefit Plans and Programs, COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF EXELON CORPORATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
