Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fleury Estevez et al v. Emergency Snack Bar, Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00574
Defendant:
Emergency Snack Bar, Corp. doing business as Emergency Taqueria NYC formerly known as Emergency Snack Bar, Emergency Snack Bar, ESB Kitchen and Bar Corp doing business as Emergency Kitchen & Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Del Carmen Fleury Estevez, Herminio Hernandez Platon and Hector Raymundo Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Aguilar-Platon v. FG Diner Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04860
Defendant:
FG Diner Inc. d/b/a Triple Crown Diner; Jointly and Severally, Athanasios Fatsis, Andre Gounaris and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguilar-Platon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Platon Jimenez-Pena v. William Barr
as 20-72438
Petitioner:
PLATON JIMENEZ-PENA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
PLATON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86451
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PABLO E PLATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pardo de Figueroa v. Euro Design Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv20469
Plaintiff:
Jaffet Pardo de Figueroa
Defendant:
Euro Design Group, Inc. and Ted Platon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Platon v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00613
Plaintiff:
Teresa Platon
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Does 1 to 100 and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc .
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. Fife Symington IV et al vs. Aristeo A. Canelos Gullen et al
as 2:2015cv09809
Plaintiff:
Alejandro N. Canelos and J. Fife Symington IV
Defendant:
Does, Aristeo A. Canelos Guillen, International Greenhouse Produce S.A. de C.V. and others
Guillen et al
as 2:2015cv09807
Movant:
Aristeo Canelos Guillen, Sergio Platon Romero Perez and Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez
Platon v. Grinshpun
as 1:2015cv20824
Plaintiff:
Platon and Veaceslav Platon
Defendant:
Grinshpun and Emmanuil Grinshpun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
