Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ganesh v. NYPD Police Officer William Clemens
as 23-1143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vidyartie Ganesh
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD Police Officer William Clemens, Shield # 27464, Police Officer Patrick Fitzmaurice, Shield # 11671, Police Officer Sergeant John McCormick and others
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc.
Domni v. County of Nassau
as 23-219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lek Domni
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Nassau, Police Officer Christopher LaMonica, Police Officer Frederick Trifaro and others
Defendant:
Police Officers John and Jane Does, 1-3, John Doe, Nassau County Correctional Officers (Nos 2-3) and John and Jane Roe, Nassau County Police Department Spokesperson
Ganesh v. NYPD Police Officer William Clemens
as 23-31
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vidyartie Ganesh
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD Police Officer William Clemens, Shield # 27464, Police Officer Patrick Fitzmaurice, Shield # 11671, Police Officer Sergeant John McCormick and others
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc.
Ganesh v. NYPD Police Officer William Clemens et al
as 1:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
Vidyartie Ganesh
Defendant:
NYPD Police Officer William Clemens, Police Officer Patrick Fitzmaurice, Police Officer SGT John McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samra v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv04874
Defendant:
The City Of New York, The New York City Police Department, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Plaintiff:
Samer M. Samra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2013cv04986
Defendant:
Detective Lieutenant John Azzata, Police Officer Donald Coupe, Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-3 2:13cv4986 and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whidbee v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Whidbee
Defendant:
The City of New York, Dang Nguyen and Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
